MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7070489238

Population turnaround in inner city Winnipeg, 1981-1986

2003· dissertation· en· W7070489238 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2003
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDowntownInner cityNeighbourhood (mathematics)PopulationCensusRentingPopulation growthQualitative researchDemographic change
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation explores the process of population turnaround in Winnipeg's inner city in the 1981-1986 period. Population turnaround is the stabilization of, or increase in, population after a period of decline. Drawing from various theoretical insights that have been used to explain inner city change, the study explores the demographic and socio-economic changes accompanying turnaround, the local factors and conditions that underlay turnaround, and the culture of turnaround in terms of the reasons, rationales and factors influencing residential choice. The study employs quantitative and qualitative methods including analyses of census and housing market data, interviews with local experts, and focus groups with residents who contributed to inner city population growth in the study period. The findings determine that the strongest factor in the turnaround process was the tight rental market conditions prevailing throughout Winnipeg during the study period--a result of low private construction activity, economic uncertainty, high mortgage and interest rates, decreased inter-provincial out-migration, increased inter-provincial in-migration, and the ageing of the population in prime rental cohorts. Turnaround in inner city Winnipeg was accompanied by strong growth in preschool age children and young- and middle-aged adults ("babyboomers"), marginal socio-economic gains and increased impoverishment, and increases in the public housing stock. Three rationales were characterized for relocating to the inner city during the study period: relocating downtown because the downtown supported a lifestyle based on simplicity, convenience and access; relocating downtown because personal circumstances left no alternative; and relocating to an older inner city neighbourhood because of its sense of community, diversity, and character. The findings challenge the conventional notion that turnaround represents a renewed interest in inner cities as places of residence and is fuelled by upper class professionals attracted by new work and housing options.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicHousing, Finance, and Neoliberalism→French-language works237,207→