MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7070523205

Perbandingan Efektivitas Dan Keamanan Ureterolitotomi Proksimal Terbuka Dan Laparoskopik Untuk Tatalaksana Batu Ureter: Sebuah Telaah Sistematis Dan Meta-Analisis

2023· other· id· W7070523205 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversitas Airlangga Repository (Universitas Airlangga) · 2023
Typeother
Languageid
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusic History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClinical efficacyPhysical activity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pendahuluan: Penatalaksanaan batu saluran kemih telah berkembang secara signifIkan. Pada batu ureter proksimal yang berukuran panjang dan lebar, keras, dan mengalami impaksi kurang efektif dengan penatalaksanaan endourologi, namun lebih efektif dengan pendekatan terbuka atau laparoskopik. Penelitian inibertujuan untuk membandingkan efIkasi dan keamanan prosedur ureterolitotomi proksimal dengan pendekatan terbuka dan laparoskopik dalam penanganan batu ureter. Metode: Pencarian sistematis dilakukan mengikuti pedoman Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) di database PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, ScienceDirect dan ClinicaITrials.gov. Beberapa hasil dinilai termasuk waktu operasi, lama rawat inap di rumah sakit, waktu pemulihan, dan komplikasi secara keseluruhan. Newcastle-ottawa scale (NOS) digunakan untuk menilai risiko bias dalam uji klinis acak. Basil: Empat penelitian kohort observasional dengan total 267 pasien, memenuhi kriteria inklusi. Bedah terbuka merniliki waktu operasi yang jauh lebih singkat (Pooled MD: 26.83 menit, 95% CI 14.37-39.29; P <0.0001) Dibandingkan dengan bedah laparoskopik. Tidak ada perbedaan signiftkan yang ditemukan pada komplikasi keseluruhan (Pooled OR: 0.64 95% CI 0.26 - 1.61; P = 0.35). Ureterolitotomi laparoskopik memberikan lama rawat inap yang lebih pendek secara signiftkan (Pooled MD: -2.23 hari 95% CI -4.20 - -0.26; P <0.03) dan pemuIihan yang lebih cepat (Pooled MD: -9.67 hari 95% CI -10.26 - -7.63; P<0.00001). Kesimpulan: Ureterolitotomi proksimal terbuka menunjukkan waktu operasi yang lebih singkat, sedangkan ureterolitotomi laparoskopik menawarkan keuntungan dalam hal nyeri pasca operasi yang lebih rendah, masa rawat inap yang lebih singkat, dan pemulihan yang lebih cepat. Kedua pendekatan menunjukkan Tingkat komplikasi keseluruhan intraoperatif yang serupa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.012
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversitas Airlangga Repository (Universitas Airlangga)Same topicMusic History and CultureFrench-language works237,207