Prevalencia de síntomas de ansiedad en una muestra de estudiantes universitarios en unafacultad de ciencias de la salud en México
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Anxiety symptoms are one of the\nmore frequent mental health related issues prevalent\non the Mexican population. College students\nare at risk of developing anxiety symptoms because\nof the challenges related to starting college studies\nand pursuing a college degree. Objective: Levels of\nanxiety symptoms in a sample of college students\nwere assessed to examine their prevalence among\nthe different university school programs. Participants:\n270 college students at the National Autonomus\nUniversity of Mexico, FES Iztacala, Faculty of\nHealth Sciences. Method: Beck Anxiety Inventory\nwas completed by the balanced sample at University\ncampus. Results: Almost one quarter of the\npopulation has symptoms of anxiety above the cut\npoint. Female students showed to be more anxious\nthan male students. Younger students showed higher\nprevalence of anxiety symptoms. Conclusions:\nFindings provide evidence that females may be at a\nhigher risk of developing anxiety symptoms, which\ncould impact their academic performance. Likewise,\nthe youngest students are an area of opportunity\nto be detected and channeled to specialized services\non campus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".