MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7070787500

Quarterly Business Indicators 2ND QUARTER 2013

2013· article· en· W7070787500 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLincoln (University of Nebraska) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic, Social, and Health Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Taxable incomeUnemploymentFiscal yearAnnual growth %Government (linguistics)CommissionJob creation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Quarterly Business Indicators for the 2nd quarter of 2013 show steady growth in the Lincoln, Nebraska economy. Growth rates in the Lincoln area are similar to growth rates nationwide. The Lincoln MSA unemployment rate remains at year ago levels (Figure 1) but is still half of the U.S. rate (Figure 2). Lincoln is experiencing solid job growth and rapid growth in hours-worked and building permits. Non-farm employment grew by 1.4% in the Lincoln MSA between the 2nd quarter of 2012 and 2013, which is slightly below the 1.6% growth rate nationwide (Figure 4). Building permits were up 21.2% in Lincoln between the 2nd quarter of 2012 and 2013 (Figure 6). Average hours worked rose by a robust 1.9% in the Lincoln MSA over the last year (Figure 8). Motor vehicle taxable sales rose sharply in the Lincoln MSA between the 2nd quarter of 2012 and 2013 (Figure 10, Table 1). However, other taxable sales were up only modestly in Lincoln (Figure 9, Table 1). Among individual industries, manufacturing employment expanded between the 2nd quarter of 2012 and 2013 (Table 1), at twice the national rate. Insurance employment expanded, and growth was rapid in other financial services, which grew by 2.7%. Professional, scientific and technical employment grew in Lincoln, but at only half the national growth rate. There was solid growth in education and health care employment. Finally, given Nebraska’s relatively strong fiscal condition, state government employment expanded in Lincoln over the last year, while it continued to decline nationally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.014
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1380.227

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLincoln (University of Nebraska)Same topicEconomic, Social, and Health StudiesFrench-language works237,207