MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7070816989

Quel profil présentent les adolescents engagés dans les mouvements de jeunesse en Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles ?

2016· dissertation· fr· W7070816989 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicYouth Development and Social Support
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoison controlAdolescent developmentGender relations
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé (français) Dans le but d’explorer les facteurs susceptibles d’influencer le profil des jeunes inscrits dans les mouvements de jeunesse, nous avons interrogé 163 scouts et guides issus de 12 unités rurales et urbaines en Belgique francophone. À travers une recherche exploratoire principalement basée sur la littérature en sciences de l’éducation (Piel, 1968 ; Huebner & Mancini, 2003 ; Denault & Poulin, 2009) trois catégories de facteurs ont été envisagées en rapport avec les caractéristiques personnelles, familiales et celles induites par les pairs. Des descriptions, corrélations de B-Pearson et anovas ainsi que des analyses clusters nous ont permis de mettre en avant une certaine homogénéité de profil présentée par les jeunes mais aussi l’importance des influences familiales telles que l’appartenance antérieures des parents aux différents mouvements, leur niveau scolaire et leur statut relationnel. Nous avons aussi pu faire ressortir les relations induites par les pairs en raison de leur valorisation positive des activités et de leur participation. Enfin, les caractéristiques personnelles telles que l’âge et le genre des jeunes sont aussi ressorties comme influentes. Des pistes concernant l’influence induite par le sexe des animateurs sur le genre des jeunes ; les périodes de transition vécues par les adolescents ; le statut relationnel des parents ainsi que l’effet de groupe sont envisagées en fin de recherche. Abstract (english) In order to explore the influential factors to the profile of young people enrolled in the youth movements, we interviewed 163 scouts and guides from 12 rural and urban units distributed throughout the French part of Belgium. Through an exploratory research based on American, Canadian, French and Chilean literature, three categories of factors were considered in relation to personal, family and peers. Descriptions, B-Pearson correlations, anova’s and cluster’s analyzes enabled us to highlight the importance of family influences such as parents previously involved in different movements, parental grade level and parental relationship status. We were also able to highlight the relationship induced by peers for their positive valuation of activities and participation. Finally, personal characteristics such as young people’s age and gender also emerged as influential. Resumen (español) Con el fin de explorar los factores que influyen en el perfil de los jóvenes inscritos en los movimientos juveniles, se entrevistó a 163 scouts y guías de 12 unidades rurales y urbanas distribuidas en la parte francófona de Bélgica. A través de una investigación exploratoria sobre la base de la literatura americana, canadiense, francesa y chilena, tres categorías de factores fueron considerados en relación con las características personales, familiares y las que parecían inducidas por los amigos. Descripciones, correlaciones de B-Pearson, anovas y analices cluster nos han permitido poner de relieve la importancia de las influencias familiares, tales como padres antes pertenecientes a diferentes movimientos, el nivel de grado de los padres y su estado civil. También hemos sido capaces de poner de relieve la relación inducida por los amigos con la valoración positiva de las actividades y su participación. Por último, las características personales como la edad y el sexo de los jóvenes también surgieron como influyentes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.506
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B))Same topicYouth Development and Social SupportFrench-language works237,207