Reinterpretation of Azolla primaeva (Azollaceae, Eocene, Canada) using electron microscopy and X-ray tomographic microscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Azolla primaeva (Penhallow) Arnold fertile whole plants from the lower Eocene of Driftwood Creek, Canada have been examined using LM, SEM, TEM and SRXTM methods on hand specimens and sieved residues. The new data have resulted in an emended diagnosis. The megaspore is partly covered by filosum and the wall lacks excrescences. The exoperine is highly variable with nodular, to clavate, baculate and tabulate elements, which fuse to form a foveolate to reticulate megaspore surface, which is complex and contorted. Glochidia on the microspore massulae are sometimes septate and the flukes on their anchor-shaped tips are variable, some being long, narrow and wavy, others shorter and broad and a few are recurved. Hairs are lacking on the massula surface and glochidia. The organization of the float zone of the megaspore apparatus has always been controversial with 0, 1, 3 or 9 floats proposed. The new results show that there are no pseudovacuolate floats. By contrast, the ‘float’ zone consists of bundles of modified granular and filamentous endoperine elements surrounded by bundles of broader suprafilosum hairs. The absence of pseudovacuolate floats in A. primaeva is suggested to be an important character for phylogenetic analyses. The high variability in glochidia tips, glochidia septa and exoperine organisation is unusual within the genus Azolla. The new data on A. primaeva are compared with the other two whole plant Azolla species from Canada (Azolla stanleyi and Azolla schopfii) and with dispersed Azolla reproductive structures from Canada including the Arctic. This confirms that all are distinct species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".