MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7070917691

The PRISMA Statement consists of a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram.
\nThe aim of the PRISMA Statement is to help authors improve the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We have focused
\non randomized trials, but PRISMA can also be used as a basis for reporting systematic reviews of other types of research, particularly evaluations of interventions. However, the PRISMA checklist is not a quality assessment instrument to gauge the quality
\nof a systematic review.

2009· other· en· W7070917691 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) · 2009
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilCare and Public Health Research Institute, Universiteit MaastrichtHealth Services Research and DevelopmentCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthCancer Research UKMcMaster UniversityOttawa Hospital Research InstituteJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of IoanninaGlaxoSmithKlineUniversity of BernUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsChecklistSystematic reviewStatement (logic)MEDLINEGuidelineComponent (thermodynamics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.209
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.120
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2090.120
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0180.006
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.443
GPT teacher head0.502
Teacher spread0.059 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueArchivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano)French-language works237,207