The relationship between home visiting and parental behaviour in a community based prevention research project
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study used data collected from the interviews conducted on the participants of the 'Better Beginnings, Better Futures' research demonstration project carried out in four sites in Ontario, Canada. The sample size was 370 parents with children aged 18 and 33 months. All the participants were from neighborhoods identified as at risk in the selected sites (Guelph, Kingston, Ottawa, Toronto). The purpose of the study was to examine the impact of home visiting on participants, parenting behaviour as measured by the Parenting Practices Scale (Strayhorn & Weidman, 1988), and whether being born in or outside Canada had an influence on parental behaviour. The study also sought to establish if there was a relationship between home visiting and the use of community resources, and whether being born in or outside Canada had an influence on the utilization of community resources by parents when their children are 18 and 33 months old. In addition the study will provide descriptive information about the home visited parents of the 'Better Beginnings, Better Futures ' project. Overall MANOVA results did not show significant results in either parenting behaviour or utilization of community resources of parents who received some or a lot of home visiting. Being born in or outside Canada did not influence parenting behaviour but it influenced the utilization of community resources at 18 months.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".