MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7070921363

Real-time 3D Pose Estimation Using Photogrammetry and Laser Based Geometrical Target Tracking for Autonomous Operation in Space

2001· article· en· W7070921363 on OpenAlexaffvenue

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Satellite Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotogrammetryLaser scanningPoseFocus (optics)Tracking (education)Laser trackerRangingFeature (linguistics)Laser
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we show that a 3D laser scanner tracking system can be efficiently used in a projective mode similar to photogrammetry-based methods. The best of both laser ranging and photogrammetry can be combined to increase the accuracy and reliability of a 6 DOF pose estimation/tracking system. Geometrical tracking and object pose evaluation using the laser scanner projective coordinate system becomes equivalent to a video camera/photogrammetry based approach with the added feature of measuring the focus distance of the image point and being able to track geometrical features as well as targets. Tracking and ranging from either the laser scanner XYZ coordinates or the photogrammetry projective model can be used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicSpace Satellite Systems and ControlFrench-language works237,207