MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7071071830

The Role of Ultraviolet Radiation in the Development of Skin Cancer and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in Canada

2020· dissertation· en· W7071071830 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSkin Protection and Aging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkin cancerMelanomaCohortIncidence (geometry)Basal cell carcinomaCancerUltraviolet radiationProportional hazards modelCohort study
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is an established cause of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and moderate exposure is hypothesized to be protective against some non-cutaneous cancers, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The first aim of this thesis was to estimate the current and future burden of melanoma and NMSCs associated with UVR and modifiable UVR behaviours in Canada. The second aim was to explore the relationship of time spent in the sun and the risk of NHL in a Canadian setting. 
\n
\nMethods: The burden of skin cancer associated with UVR in 2015 was estimated by comparing 2015 rates of melanoma and NMSCs with estimated rates of a 1920 birth cohort for melanoma and with rates of less exposed body sites (trunk and legs) for NMSCs. Skin cancer attributable to modifiable UVR behaviours (indoor tanning, sunburn, and sunbathing) was estimated using relative risks relevant to Canada by conducting meta-analyses and prevalence of exposures from a nationally representative survey. A prospective cohort study examining the risk of NHL was conducted using self-reported questionnaire data from three Canadian cohorts that were linked to cancer incidence data. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, using age as the time-scale was employed to investigate this relationship with control for relevant confounders. 
\n
\nResults: For 2015, we estimated that 62.3% of melanomas, 80.5% of basal cell carcinomas (BCC), and 83.0% of squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) were attributable to UVR, while 29.7% of melanomas, 46.0% of BCCs, and 17.4% of SCCs were attributable to modifiable UVR behaviours. Compared to individuals spending < 30 min/day in the sun the risk of developing NHL was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.55-1.28) for 30-59 minutes, 0.63 (95% CI: 0.40-0.98) for 1-2 hours, and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.61-1.36) for > 2 hours. 
\n
\nConclusions: Prevention efforts aimed at modifiable UVR behaviours are crucial for reducing the burden of skin cancer in Canada, while moderate exposure to the sun may reduce the risk of NHL. Further research is required to clarify the optimal UVR exposure patterns in terms of preventing the development of both cutaneous and non-cutaneous cancers, including NHL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicSkin Protection and AgingFrench-language works237,207