Statement by Dr. K.Y. Amoako United Nations Under Secretary General and Executive Secretary of the ECA: South African development community conference
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Statement BY Dr. K. Y. Amoako United Nations Under-Secretary General and Executive Secretary of ECA at the south African Development Community Conference (SADC). Dr. Amoako, on his remarks highlighted that ECA's own research results presented in the 1999 Report on Africa confirms that fully 70 percent of our countries in 1998 enjoyed real economic growth in excess of population growth ant that more than a third of these countries last year recorded growth of 5 percent and above. The continent's economic recovery, while not solid enough, has at least reached the point where policy discretion can be brought to bear on this core topic. HIV/AIDS was a factor for the development of many of our countries even 10 years ago, but was not spoken about in central policy circles in many of the countries affected. The impact of HIVAIDS households, economic sectors and society in general are devastating and well known. Regional integration is as much a political process as it is an economic phenomenon. The history of integration runs parallel to a history of building strong multistate institutions. In the way forward, SADC will still face several challenges. In particular, one of those will be to streamline the relationships between member states in the context of SADC, COMESA and SACU.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.091 | 0.054 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".