MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7071234370

Resting-State Alpha Activity in the Frontal and Occipital Lobes and Assessment of Cognitive Impairment in Depression Patients

2024· article· en· W7071234370 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepression (economics)CognitionElectroencephalographyMajor depressive disorderBeijingAlpha rhythmBipolar disorderMontreal Cognitive Assessment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Xiao-Meng Xie,1 Sha Sha,1 Hong Cai,2 Xinyu Liu,1 Isadora Jiang,3 Ling Zhang,1 Gang Wang1 1The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders Beijing Anding Hospital & the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, School of Mental Health, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Unit of Medical Psychology and Behavior Medicine, School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People’s Republic of China; 3Bellarmine College of Liberal Arts, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, USACorrespondence: Gang Wang, Beijing Anding Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, Email gangwangdoc@gmail.comBackground: Major depressive disorder (MDD) becomes one of the psychiatric disorders characteristic of a combination of cognitive, emotional, and somatic symptoms. Additionally, cognitive impairment has the most significant impact on functional results. However, the evaluation of cognitive level is still based on various subjective questionnaires as there is no objective standard assessment yet. This research focuses on resting-state alpha activity to identify cognition in MDD patients using electroencephalography (EEG) signals.Methods: Ninety-two subjects were recruited: 44 patients with MDD and 48 healthy individuals as controls. Functional outcome and cognition were assessed using standardized instruments, and the EEG resting state signal of open and closed eyes was recorded. The comparison and correlation of cognitive levels with alpha power in the bilateral frontal region, bilateral central region, bilateral occipital region, and middle line was evaluated.Results: The relative alpha power in MDD group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Through correlation analysis, it was shown that the bilateral frontal and occipital alpha power of MDD patients in the closed-eyes state was positively correlated with information processing rate, verbal learning, working memory, and attention retention. The alpha power of the bilateral frontal region in the open-eyes state was positively correlated with information processing rate, working memory, and attention retention (P < 0.05).Conclusion: The research indicates that the changes in frontal and occipital alpha activities may be a promising neurophysiological indicator of cognitive level to diagnose and treat response prediction.Keywords: major depressive disorder, MDD, EEG, alpha power, cognition impairment

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.338
GPT teacher head0.596
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies→French-language works237,207→