MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7071302588

Role of electrical and mixed synapses in the modulation of spinal cord sensory reflexes

2012· dissertation· en· W7071302588 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsElectrical SynapsesSpinal cordNeurotransmissionGap junctionSensory systemCentral nervous systemElectrophysiologyReflexNervous system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first part of my thesis involves an investigation into mechanisms underlying the presynaptic regulation of transmitter release from myelinated hindlimb sensory afferents in rodents. The central hypothesis is that in addition to chemical transmission in spinal neuronal networks, electrical synapses formed by connexins are critically involved in presynaptic inhibition of large diameter sensory afferents. Subsequent sections of the thesis present a detailed examination of the distribution of connexins in the rodent spinal cord with a particular emphasis on the neuronal connexin, Cx36. Connexin36 (Cx36) is widely believed to be the protein forming the neuronal gap junctions that create electrical synapses between mammalian neurons in many areas of the central nervous system (Condorelli et al 1998). The first part of thesis concerns a previously unknown role of neuronal connexins in interneurone pathways involved in presynaptic control of synaptic transmission in the lumbar spinal cord of rodents. As far as we are aware, the idea that electrical contacts between spinal neurons contribute to spinal presynaptic inhibition is a novel hypothesis. Evidence will be presented: 1) that Cx36 is present in regions of the spinal cord containing interneurons involved in presynaptic inhibition, 2) that the lack of Cx36 in Cx36-/- knockouts mice results in a severe impairment of presynaptic inhibition, and 3) that blocking gap junctions pharmacologically in wild type mice impairs presynaptic inhibition. The exploration of this hypothesis will involve a combination of electrophysiological and immunohistochemical approaches in juvenile wild-type and knockout mice lacking Cx36, as well as immunohistochemical observations in adult rodents. This first section of the thesis begins with the development of a preparation in which several measures of presynaptic inhibition described in the in vivo adult cat preparation can be examined in vitro in young mice. The following sections of the thesis describe the distribution and features of Cx36 on neurons in mice and rats of different ages in four parts. The first will show that Cx36 is the only connexin associated with spinal neurons and refutes claims in the literature about the existence of a variety of connexions on spinal neurons. The second part will show that while gap junctions between some spinal neurons are only a transient developmental phenomenon, they persist in abundance in adult animals. The third part will present evidence of a previously unsuspected III association of Cx36 gap junctions at the chemical synapse between muscle afferent fibres and motoneurons. Specifically, an association between Cx36 and the glutamate transporter used in primary afferents, Vglut1 will be described. To our knowledge these results are the first to suggest the existence of mixed (electrical and chemical) synapses between primary afferents and motoneurons in the mature mammalian spinal cord. The final part of the thesis will describe the presence of Cx36 gap junctions on adult sacral motoneurons involved in control of sexual, urinary and defecation functions in the rodent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicConnexins and lens biology→French-language works237,207→