MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7071509804

Study of the carcinogenic potential of the E6 protein of human papillomavirus type 16

2014· dissertation· en· W7071509804 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCervical cancerCarcinogenPopulationCancerMutationGeneHuman papillomavirusHeLa
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While most Human papillomavirus (HPV) infections are asymptomatic and self-resolved, high-risk types, such as HPV-16 and HPV-18 are responsible for 99% of cervical cancers worldwide, whereas low-risk types, such as HPV-6 and HPV-11, are responsible for 90% of genital warts. While the different types of HPV and their varying oncogenicities have been studied extensively, it is still not clear what features of a HPV type make it more oncogenic than another. Two aspects which could affect the oncogenicity of HPV were studied: HPV variants and the E6 protein’s interaction with membrane associated guanylate kinase (MAGUK) proteins. Previous studies have shown that some HPV-16 variants may be more oncogenic than others. The first goal of this work was to characterise the HPV-16 variants in a Manitoba cervical cancer sample population to possibly identify mutations which could be associated with an increased risk of developing cervical cancer. Seventy-five samples from different individuals were sequenced in three distinct regions: the long control region and the E6 and E7 open reading frames. The DNA sequences obtained from these genomic regions were then compared between HPV-16 cervical cancer samples and Manitoba HPV-16 non cancer samples to identify any mutations that were exclusive to the cervical cancer samples. No specific mutations in any of the regions could be associated with cervical cancer. It is also proposed that HPV16 E6 protein’s interaction with MAGUK proteins contributes to its oncogenicity since low-risk E6 proteins lack this ability. The second goal of this work was to investigate which regions of high-risk HPV E6 proteins are needed in order to achieve MAGUK protein degradation, more specifically MAGI-1 degradation. Wild-type high-risk HPV16E6, low-risk HPV6E6, as well as mutants, were synthesized and cloned into vectors. In vitro translated proteins were used in MAGI-1 degradation assays. The ability of both wild-type HPV6 and HPV16 E6 proteins to degrade MAGI-1 was confirmed. Based on the performance of the different mutants in these degradation assays, it was determined that the PDZ-binding domain is necessary but not sufficient to induce E6-induced MAGI-1 degradation. In conclusion, it was determined that the entire HPV16 E6 protein is needed for the induction of MAGI-1 degradation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicCervical Cancer and HPV Research→French-language works237,207→