MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7071536225

Spatial heterogeneity and temporal variations in Echinococcus multilocularis infections in wild
\nhosts in a North American urban setting

2014· article· en· W7071536225 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMachine Learning in Bioinformatics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEchinococcus multilocularisFecesVulpesRodentCestodaIntermediate hostHost (biology)Abundance (ecology)Parasite hostingMammal
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Echinococcus multilocularis, the causative agent of human alveolar echinococcosis, has the potential to circulate
\nin urban areas where wild host populations and humans coexist. The spatial and temporal distribution
\nof infection in wild hosts locally affects the risk of transmission to humans. We investigated the
\nspatial and temporal patterns of E. multilocularis infection in coyotes and rodent intermediate hosts
\nwithin the city of Calgary, Canada, and the association between spatial variations in coyote infection
\nand the relative composition of small mammal assemblages. Infection by E. multilocularis was examined
\nin small mammals and coyote faeces collected monthly in five city parks from June 2012 to June 2013.
\nCoyote faeces were analysed using a ZnCl2 centrifugation and sedimentation protocol. Infection in intermediate
\nhosts was assessed through lethal trapping and post-mortem analysis. Parasite eggs and metacestodes
\nwere morphologically identified and molecularly confirmed through species-specific PCR assays.
\nOf 982 small mammals captured, infection was detected in 2/305 (0.66%) deer mice (Peromyscus
\nmaniculatus), 2/267 (0.75%) meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus), and 1/71 (1.41%) southern red
\nbacked voles (Myodes gapperi). Overall faecal prevalence in coyotes was 21.42% (n = 385) and varied
\nacross sites, ranging from 5.34% to 61.48%. Differences in coyote faecal prevalence across sites were consistent
\nwith local variations in the relative abundance of intermediate hosts within the small mammal
\nassemblages. Infections peaked in intermediate hosts during autumn (0.68%) and winter (3.33%), and
\nin coyotes during spring (43.47%). Peaks of infections in coyote faeces up to 83.8% in autumn were
\ndetected in a hyper-endemic area. To the best of our knowledge, our findings represent the first evidence
\nof a sylvatic life-cycle of E. multilocularis in a North American urban setting, and provide new insights into
\nthe complexity of the parasite transmission ecology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa)Same topicMachine Learning in BioinformaticsFrench-language works237,207