MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7071599730

Standardized Morphology Analysis of Cellulose Nanocrystals via a Semi-Automated Image Processing Approach

2022· dissertation· en· W7071599730 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImage processingWorkflowProcess (computing)Atomic force microscopyNISTParticle (ecology)PreprocessorParticle size
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis addresses the challenges in the investigation of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) particle size measurements using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) image analysis. Standardizing particle size measurements an important step in the design and optimization of the processes employed in the manufacture and utilization of CNCs. Current protocols used in the analyses of CNC particle morphology for TEM and AFM images are largely manual and time-consuming, and often produce inconsistent results between different researchers.\nChapter 1 introduces a new semi-automated image analysis framework that can reliably and quickly detect and classify CNCs from TEM and AFM images, measure their dimensions and each particle’s detailed shape information, and provide additional information about different CNC configurations within the images. Chapter 2 explains the development of this framework, named as CNC-SMART (CNC – Standardized Morphology Analysis for Research and Technology), which utilizes different automated and semi-automated image processing workflows. The viability of this framework is demonstrated in this work using exemplar images obtained for a National Research Council Canada certified reference material, CNCD-1. The results obtained from the SMART approach presented in this work are compared critically against the results obtained from the conventional manual approaches. These comparisons revealed a good agreement between the manual and SMART approaches and proved that CNC-SMART can expeditiously process high-throughput image data using these workflows while being minimally impacted by human error and variability.\nChapter 3 and Chapter 4 are two different demonstrations of CNC-SMART which can be considered case studies in which the SMART approach was adapted and improved for further applications. Case studies are an extension of an inter-laboratory comparison (ILC) research on CNC particle size measurements performed by ten participating research laboratories using TEM and AFM imaging. Collaborating with different researchers and using different image datasets with varying image properties such as noise and contrast helped refine the SMART approach to be a more versatile system with more capabilities that were not primarily considered during the initial development phase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it