MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7071652973

Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Snowstorms in the Contiguous United States

2013· article· en· W7071652973 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHuskie Commons (Northern Illinois University) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWinter stormStormSnowRange (aeronautics)Convective storm detectionSpatial distributionFreezing rainPrecipitation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A climatological analysis of snowstorms across the contiguous United States, based on data from 1222
\nweather stations with data during 1901–2001, defined the spatial and temporal features. The average annual
\nincidence of events creating 15.2 cm or more in 1 or 2 days, which are termed as snowstorms, exhibits great
\nspatial variability. The pattern is latitudinal across most of the eastern half of the United States, averaging
\n0.1 storm (1 storm per 10 years) in the Deep South, increasing to 2 storms along the Canadian border. This
\npattern is interrupted by higher averages downwind of the Great Lakes and in the Appalachian Mountains.
\nIn the western third of the United States where snow falls, lower-elevation sites average 0.1–2 storms per
\nyear, but averages are much higher in the Cascade Range and Rocky Mountains, where 5–30 storms occur
\nper year. Most areas of the United States have had years without snowstorms, but the annual minima are
\n1 or more storms in high-elevation areas of the West and Northeast. The pattern of annual maxima of
\nstorms is similar to the average pattern. The temporal distribution of snowstorms exhibited wide fluctuations
\nduring 1901–2000, with downward 100-yr trends in the lower Midwest, South, and West Coast. Upward
\ntrends occurred in the upper Midwest, East, and Northeast, and the national trend for 1901–2000 was
\nupward, corresponding to trends in strong cyclonic activity. The peak periods of storm activity in the United
\nStates occurred during 1911–20 and 1971–80, and the lowest frequency was in 1931–40. Snowstorms first
\noccur in September in the Rockies, in October in the high plains, in November across most of the United
\nStates, and in December in the Deep South. The month with the season’s last storms is December in the
\nSouth and then shifts northward, with April the last month of snowstorms across most of the United States.
\nStorms occur as late as May and June in the Rockies and Cascades. Snowstorms are most frequent in
\nDecember downwind of the Great Lakes, with the peak of activity in January for most other areas of the
\nUnited States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuskie Commons (Northern Illinois University)Same topicMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsFrench-language works237,207