MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7071825511

The status of introductory college chemistry in accredited colleges and universities /

2013· dissertation· en· W7071825511 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicVarious Chemistry Research Topics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYork UniversityIllinois Wesleyan UniversityLong Island UniversityEastern Michigan UniversityNiagara UniversityIdaho State UniversityIowa State UniversityLoma Linda UniversityTexas State UniversityLouisiana State UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of OklahomaNorth Carolina State UniversityEast Tennessee State UniversityHarvard UniversityMississippi State UniversityMarquette UniversityLehigh UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaFairleigh Dickinson University
KeywordsAccreditationHigher educationCurriculumQuality (philosophy)Chemistry education
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

in a specific and indicated direction, and thus reflecting a recognizable change of tendency or emphasis.Accredited Institutions are those institutions of higher education in the continental United States that are accredited by the nation's six regional associations of schools and colleges as listed on page vii of the Accredited Institutions of Higher Education, September, 1967, American Council on Higher Education, Washington, D. C. Introductory College Chemistry refers to the first-year college chemistry course which receives credit under the title "chemistry" and meets the prerequisite requirement for further chemistry courses in a college curriculum.CHAPTER II THE NEED FOR THE SURVEY 1910, was following classical lines; i.e., as the body of knowledge increased, systematic branches of chemistry appeared and so did the proliferation of chemistry courses.^^Carhart and Chute, in Woodburn and O b o u m , Teaching the Pursuit of Science.New York: MacMillan Company, 1965, p. 193.^^Woodburn and Obourn, p. 194.z^Yalman, p. 143. .13 Prior to and succeeding World War I, forces began to emerge which caused the chemistry professors to shift their chemistry offerings to meet new demands.According to Merwin,^® these influential forces were the seven cardinal principles of secondary education, 1918,2® the final report of the Committee on Sciences of the Commission on the Reorganization of Secondary Education, 1920,®® and Frederick J. Kelley's study of the liberal arts colleges.®^The Seven Cardinal Principles listed objectives of edu cation and the Committee on Sciences endorsed and recommended general chemistry for various curricula.Kelley's study called attention to the need for definite aims and made some suggestions, which in some cases, at least, appear to have stimulated and served as guides for the selection of additional courses in freshman chemistry.The combined influences of these forces produced a strong shift to the practical, the useful, in all school subjects; and an attempt was made to offer those subjects that will best fit the student for life in his community.First-year college chem istry courses and specialized chemistry courses were recommended for various curricula such as household chemistry and industrial chemistry.The first-year college chemistry course, as a result of these forces, was considerably modified.The time devoted to laboratory was lessened and 2®B.W.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma)Same topicVarious Chemistry Research TopicsFrench-language works237,207