Tuberous sclerosis complex 1 (Tsc1) regulates dE2F1 protein expression during development and cooperates with Rbf1 to control proliferation and survival in «Drosophila melanogaster»
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Retinoblastoma tumour suppressor Rb is a cell cycle regulator that is active during early G1 preventing the transition from G1 to S-phase. This is achieved by Rb inhibiting E2F transcription factors from activating expression of genes required for G1 to S-phase progression and DNA synthesis. In our initial genetic test searching for genes that interact with mutations of rbf1, the homologue of rb in Drosophila melanogaster, one of the genes identified was tsc1, which is also a tumour suppressor gene that regulates translation and cell growth. We found that in Drosophila eye imaginal disc cells, tsc1 and rbf1 mutations have a synergistic effect on increasing the level of cell death and promoting ectopic S-phase entry. In addition, I found that dE2F1 protein level increased in tsc1 mutant eye disc cells, which implies that Tsc1 is a negative regulator of dE2F1 expression. The goal of my thesis study was to characterize the synergistic relation between Rbf1 and Tsc1 as well as the regulation of dE2F1 expression by Tsc1. In cells triple-mutant for rbf1, tsc1, and de2f1, I found that the observed elevation in cell death in rbf1 and tsc1double-mutant cells was suppressed, which suggests that the cooperation between Rbf1 and Tsc1 is dE2F1-dependent. Moreover, by using a reporter construct for dE2F1 activity, PCNA-GFP, and performing in situ hybridization with anti-sense RNA probes of dE2F1 target genes, rnrS, Cyclin E, and PCNA, I showed that activities of de2f1 downstream target genes were activated by tsc1 mutations, suggesting that Tsc1 also regulates dE2F1 target gene expression. Through clonal analysis of loss-of-function mutant alleles of the canonical Tsc pathway genes, I found that Tsc1 regulates dE2F1 via the Tsc pathway, specifically tsc/rheb/Tor/s6k. Finally, my RTq-PCR result showed that the regulation of dE2F1 protein expression by Tsc1 is at post-transcriptional level. To address whether the regulation is at the level of translation, I cloned the 5' untran
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".