MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7072079082

A utilização da tecnologia InSAR na caracterização da deformação superficial do terreno no campo petrolÃfero de Canto do Amaro-RN

2015· article· en· W7072079082 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterferometric synthetic aperture radarSubsidenceDisplacement (psychology)Series (stratigraphy)Oil fieldLevellingField (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canto do Amaro field is the largest actively producing onshore hydrocarbon reservoir in Brazil, and has been in operation since its discovery in 1985. The field is undergoing enhanced oil recovery activities to support production. A total of 30 COSMO-SkyMed SAR images acquired over a period of 15 months were processed for this analysis. TRE Canada Inc. (TRE) in partnership with PETROBRAS, Rio de Janeiro State University (FGEL-UERJ) and Geomath Applied Remote Sensing Ltd. have prepared the following article as a demonstration of the capabilities of InSAR technology for monitoring surface deformation over an actively producing oil field. The following points summarize the key features of this article: (i) Surface displacement over the Canto do Amaro field was comprehensively characterized by the high density of measurement points obtained from the SqueeSARTM analysis; (ii) Several distinct features of uplift were identified over areas that appear to be undergoing active operations with up to +87 mm of uplift observed; (iii) Mild subsidence was also observed within the area; (iv) The time series of the measurement points provided an indication of non-linear changes in movement trends over time, and can be used to isolate unique displacement patterns within the results. The time series could also be compared to other monitoring results, including DGPS measurements and; (v) Cross sections and average time series over several features of movement within the area of active operations provide additional insight into the results over multiple spatial scales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research)Same topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207