WERNER JAEGERHUBER’S <i>MESSE SUR LES AIRS VODOUESQUES</i> OR <i>MESSE\nFOLKLORIQUE HAÏTIENNE</i>: A PERFORMANCE EDITION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Originally written for solo soprano with choir and organ, Werner Jaegerhuber completed this work in 1953, and his close friend and artistic collaborator, Louis Maximilien, commissioned it for the sesquicentennial of Haiti’s independence on January 1, 1954. However, since there are no published scores or even a reliable manuscript of this piece, what has been kept in the archives of the Société de recherche et de diffusion de la musique Haïtienne in Montreal, Canada are two dissimilar scores by unknown sources. One is the choral and organ version, which was made by a professional copyist in the 1950’s (judging by the type of paper they used) and the other is just vocal, which is most likely a 1970’s version. John Jost, a well-known arranger and orchestrator of Haitian folk music, attempted to transcribe this mass for a string orchestra with choir as he thought that Jaegerhuber would have wished to have this type of ensemble at his disposition. The only problem is that Jost never wrote a score for that transcription. This critical performance edition is based upon his idea of the string orchestra, using the earlier manuscript alongside the cultural traditions of Haitian folk songs and rhythms, and Voodoo ceremonies’ customs to create a clean version for the encouragement, promotion and assistance of future performances of this piece.\nThe introduction provides a synopsis of Jaegerhuber’s biography, style, and influences for an enlightened presentation. The description and editorial procedure include a background of the Mass and selected analyses of its organization. The conclusion is the newly edited full score. The appendixes comprise the facsimile of the unknown manuscript, the newly edited orchestral parts, and the full orchestral score from the original version of the Kyrie and Benedictus.\nAdvisor: Tyler G. White
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".