MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7072197613

Tra fonti letterarie e fonti giuridiche: una nuova biografia di Benincasa d’Arezzo iuris professor

2021· article· it· W7072197613 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUse Siena air (University of Siena) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNomeHastaMedieval history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il saggio è dedicato a Benincasa d’Arezzo, giurista menzionato da Dante all’inizio del canto VI del Purgatorio e altrimenti noto come Benincasa da Laterina nella letteratura dantesca. Grazie all’esame congiunto dei documenti d’archivio, del secolare commento alla Commedia e di alcune fonti giuridiche sono stati ricostruiti i legami del giurista con il castello di Laterina (Arezzo), luogo di origine del padre, la duplice relazione con Francesco d’Accursio, di cui Benincasa è stato prima allievo e poi collega, e la carriera di docente svoltasi tra Arezzo e Bologna. Negli anni Ottanta del Duecento l’Aretino è attestato come giudice assessore dei podestà di Siena (1282, 1283 e 1285) e Bologna (1286), con un significativo ruolo tecnico e politico nel contesto dell’alleanza guelfa ultraregionale e delle relazioni personali intessute con due esponenti della casata dei Guidi, conti palatini in Tuscia. L’esame del commento antico alla Commedia, ove spicca la tradizione esegetica comune all’Anonimo Lombardo e al commento del giurista Alberico da Rosciate, ha contribuito a chiarire le circostanze della morte di Benincasa (post 1286 - ante 1292), a causa di un omicidio compiuto per vendetta da Ghino di Tacco durante un’udienza, verosimilmente a Perugia. Tra le testimonianze sull’attività dottrinale del giurista, il manoscritto 285 del Collegio di Spagna di Bologna ha permesso di individuare circa sessanta additiones sul Digestum Vetus, due delle quali autografe, riconducibili all’insegnamento bolognese di Benincasa d’Arezzo, che vanno ad aggiungersi alla quæstio
\noxoniense e al consilium sul castello di Monterotondo già noti. Una quæstio disputata autografa in tema di evizione è parzialmente confluita, sotto il nome di Francesco d’Accursio, nel Tractatus de guarentigiato instrumento attribuito a Guido da Suzzara.
\n
\nThis essay focuses on Benincasa d’Arezzo, a jurist mentioned by Dante in the Purgatorio at the beginning of Canto VI, who is otherwise known as Benincasa da Laterina by the scholars of Dante’s Commedia. Through the Purgatorio, we reconstructed some links with the Laterina castle (Arezzo), wich was the place of origin of the jurist’s father. Benincasa has first been a student and then a colleague of Francesco d’Accursio, and he has teached in Arezzo and in Bologna. Later, between 1282 and 1286, Benincasa has carried out the role of judex assessor of the podestà in Siena and in Bologna, playing also significantly a technical and political role in the context of the ultra-regional Guelph alliance, and in view of the personal relationships with two members of the Guidi family, conti palatini in Tuscia. The death of Benincasa (post 1286 - ante 1292) is described by the various commentators of the Commedia. In particular, Anonimo Lombardo and Alberico da Rosciate add some interesting details to the story: the
\njurist has been murdered by Ghino di Tacco during a court hearing, probably in Perugia. In addition to the quæstio oxoniense and to the consilium regarding the Monterotondo castle, already known, around sixty Benincasa’s additiones on Digestum Vetus have been found in the manuscript 285, held by Collegio di Spagna in Bologna. The Tractatus de guarentigiato instrumento, attributed to Guido da Suzzara, contains a quæstio disputata about the topic of eviction, wich took place in Bologna between Benincasa d’Arezzo and Francesco d’Accursio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUse Siena air (University of Siena)Same topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207