Utility of the theory of planned behaviour in health services research when examining the intentions of immunization provider behaviour / by Jill Fediurek.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper will demonstrate the need for public health involvement with health services \nresearch in order to effectively meet its' mandate for achieving population health. \nThe success of our public health programs requires working effectively with other health service \nproviders to achieve desired outcomes. The goal of the vaccine preventable disease program in \nOntario will be used to illustrate the importance of health services research in accomplishing the \ndesired outcomes. In Ontario, immunizations are primarily administered outside of the public \nhealth domain with approximately 85% of immunizations being administered in primary \nhealthcare settings such as family physician offices or community health care centers. How do \npublic health professionals affect immunization provider behaviour that is performed by \nindependent practitioners in other healthcare sectors? The answer lies with health services \nresearchers who wish to predict and understand specific behaviour in health care professionals. \nKnowledge transfer or implementation research which focuses on investigating the \nuptake of evidence-based practice in health care professionals has been conducted through \nquestionnaires based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour (Francis et ah, 2004). The importance \nof immunization and the goal of the vaccine preventable disease program in Ontario will be \npresented. The theoretical framework of the Theory of Planned Behaviour will be examined to \nhiglilight the constructs of the theory and how they interact with one another. Next, the \napplication of the Theory of Planned Behaviour as a theoretical model on which to base the \ndesign of a questionnaire to assess health care provider's immunization behaviour will be \nreviewed. A survey instrument (jointly developed by the Communicable Diseases Epidemiology \nServices of the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control and the Clinical Trials Research Centre from Dalhousie University) to measure the psychological determinants of immunization \nintentions of Canadian Immunization Providers will be examined to detennine its usefulness for \npublic health. Finally recommendations for future research will be presented in order to identify \npriorities for health service research to effectively advance the goals and objectives of staff \nworking in the vaccine preventable diseases program area in Ontario.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".