MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7072306065

Wideband dual-polarized octagonal cavity-backed radiating open prism antennas with low cross-polarization and high gain

2023· dissertation· en· W7072306065 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWidebandGround planeAperture (computer memory)High-gain antennaAntenna gainBandwidth (computing)Antenna (radio)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents and investigates a novel high-performance antenna design for remote sensing and satellite communications applications that is compact and lightweight. The performance requirements include dual-polarization, wide impedance bandwidth, low cross-polarization, high gain, and high aperture efficiency. To simultaneously achieve all these qualities is challenging and a combination of compatible performance enhancement techniques was selected and derived. A new antenna design, namely an octagonal cavity-backed radiating open prism (OCROP) antenna, was first introduced. The antenna is orthogonally and differentially fed to provide dual-polarization and low cross-polarization. The impedance bandwidth is increased by combining the resonances from the radiating feedlines and the open prism. The corner truncated octagonal ground cavity, instead of a more commonly seen square ground plane or square ground cavity, is used to further suppress the cross-polarization and enhance the gain and aperture efficiency. To show the superiority of the octagonal design, it was compared with a square ground cavity backed antenna. To further improve the gain of this novel antenna, its array and flared configurations are considered, investigated, and compared. The array design offers higher gain and aperture efficiency, while the flared design can provide lower cross-polarization. To achieve higher gain with the flared design, a larger flare angle was chosen which increased cross-polarization. To remedy the problem of the increased cross-polarization, a new iris design concept is proposed and investigated. It shows that this method can successfully suppress the cross-polarization of the flared design. This concept is general and has the potential to be applied to other types of aperture antennas. The design concepts and the simulation results are verified by fabricating and testing two prototypes, i.e., with and without a flare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→