Association study confirms the role of two OCA2 polymorphisms in normal skin pigmentation variation in East Asian populations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: \n \nThe main goal of the study was to test the association of 18 polymorphisms located within nine pigmentation candidate genes with quantitative skin pigmentation measures collected in a sample of individuals of East Asian ancestry living in Canada (N = 419). \n \nMethods: \n \nThe 18 polymorphisms are located within genes that show putative signatures of positive selection in East Asian populations. The genetic markers were selected for genotyping based on an annotation of common East Asian polymorphisms to predict potential functional effects. We restricted our attention to polymorphisms that have an allele frequency difference of at least 30% between East Asian populations and African and European populations, or have alleles that are present in East Asians, but are absent in Africans and Europeans. \n \nResults: \n \nTwo nonsynonymous variants selected within the OCA2 gene, rs1800414 (His615Arg) and rs74653330 (Ala481Thr), were significantly associated with melanin levels in the sample. Both single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are nonsynonymous polymorphisms located more than 30 kb apart on chromosome 15 and have very different frequencies in the East Asian sample. Additionally, both polymorphisms are predicted to have a deleterious effect on the protein. Linear regression analysis using an additive model indicate that each copy of the derived rs1800414 allele G decreases Melanin Index approximately 0.9 units and each copy of the derived rs74653330 allele A decreases Melanin Index approximately 1.9 units. \n \nConclusions: \n \nTwo nonsynonymous OCA2 polymorphisms (rs1800414 and rs74653330) are independently associated with normal skin pigmentation variation in East Asian populations and have very different frequency distributions in East Asia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".