MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7073840704

Prehospital point-of-care lactate following trauma: A systematic review

2016· article· en· W7073840704 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQueensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservational studyGrading (engineering)Trauma centerBlood lactateMEDLINETriageBlunt traumaResuscitation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Serum lactate serves as a surrogate marker for global tissue hypoxia following traumatic injury and has potential to guide resuscitation. Portable, handheld point-of-care monitoring devices enable lactate values to be readily available in the prehospital environment. The current review examines the utility of prehospital lactate (pLa) measurement in the management of trauma.METHODS MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched using predefined criteria (pLa measurement, trauma patients) until March 10, 2016. Studies were examined for lactate measurement as an intervention, prognostic indicator, and utilization in the guidance of goal-directed therapy. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk of bias, and quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Data were unsuitable for meta-analysis and are presented in narrative form.RESULTS Of 2,415 articles of interest, seven met the inclusion criteria, all of which were observational studies, including 2,085 trauma patients. Lactate sampling techniques, timings, and thresholds were heterogeneous. No studies used pLa to guide intervention. Elevated pLa may be an independent prognostic marker of critical illness in trauma patients, particularly in blunt trauma. Prehospital lactate measurement may be more sensitive than systolic blood pressure in determining need for resuscitative care. Early lactate measurement may be particularly useful in the detection of occult hypoperfusion, with elevated pLa detectable within 30 minutes of injury. All current studies were assessed as being of low or very low quality and were at risk of bias. Considerable logistical barriers to pLa measurement exist.CONCLUSIONS Prehospital point-of-care lactate monitoring for trauma has been variably performed. There is a paucity of evidence relating to its use. The limited data available show feasibility and potential clinical utility, and further investigation is warranted to establish whether lactate might give meaningful guidance during prehospital triage and trauma patient resuscitation.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Systematic review, level IV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score0.526

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQueensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland)Same topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207