MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7073911353

Dexamethasone and antibiotics for the empirical treatment of bacterial meningitis in Canadian children: A survey of paediatric infectious diseases specialists

2002· article· en· W7073911353 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDexamethasoneMeningitisNeisseria meningitidisHaemophilus influenzaeAntibioticsEtiologyBacterial meningitisPenicillin
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: With the changing epidemiology of the etiological agents causing bacterial meningitis in Canada, the purposes of this study were to determine what empirical antibiotic(s) is/are advocated, and whether dexamethasone is recommended as adjunctive therapy by paediatric infectious diseases specialists for suspected meningitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitides, Haemophilus influenzae type b, and partially treated (PT) bacterial meningitis. METHODS: A questionnaire invoking the specialists’ preferred choices in treating bacterial meningitis was circulated by e-mail in March 1999 to 41 paediatric infectious diseases specialists or microbiologists (Paediatric Investigators Collaborative Network on Infections in Canada [PICNIC] members) who practised in 13 paediatric centres located in eight provinces. RESULTS: Thirty-two (78% response rate) replies were received by July 1999 from 11 paediatric centres in seven provinces. Dexamethasone was recommended by 11 of 32 (34%) respondents for suspected S pneumoniae, four of 32 (12%) for suspected N meningitides, 18 of 32 (56%) for suspected H influenzae type b and five of 32 (16%) for suspected PT meningitis. A trend for more frequent recommended use of dexamethasone for S pneumoniae, H influenzae type b and N meningitides meningitis was found in eastern provinces (Ontario, Quebec and Nova Scotia), as opposed to the western provinces (Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta and British Columbia). The most commonly recommended first line empirical antibiotic therapy was vancomycin plus 3rd-generation cephalosporin (V+3C). This was recommended by 27 of 32 (84%) respondents for suspected S pneumoniae, seven of 32 (22%) for suspected N meningitides, six of 32 (19%) for suspected H influenzae type b and 24 of 32 (75%) for PT meningitis; the remainder recommended using a 3C empirically for each type of meningitis. The major reason cited by respondents for using V+3C for suspected S pneumoniae was the presence of high-and intermediate-level penicillin-resistant S pneumoniae in their centres. No differences were found in the choice of antibiotic(s) between practitioners in the eastern and western provinces. CONCLUSIONS: Although regional differences exist, the majority of paediatric infectious diseases experts no longer favour the use of dexamethasone for empirical therapy in most cases of bacterial meningitis. V+3C has become the regimen of choice in Canada for most cases of suspected bacterial meningitis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed CentralSame topicTheoretical and Computational PhysicsFrench-language works237,207