MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7074089066

Evaluation of Norovirus Persistence on Farm and Agriculturally-relevant Environments

2012· other· en· W7074089066 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2012
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNorovirusPersistence (discontinuity)VirusMurine norovirusTransmission (telecommunications)TiterFecesRisk assessmentLoamVirus quantification
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human norovirus (NoV) causes gastroenteritis worldwide and has been associated with a number of produce related outbreaks. The design of effective inactivation and prevention procedures requires an understanding of virus survival in environments applicable to the production and processing of fresh produce. To evaluate the extent of NoV risk from farm to fork, the survival of murine norovirus (MNV), a surrogate for human NoV, was studied on stainless steel disks, soil and in bottled water for 42 days and on lettuce for 15 days in the laboratory. Stability experiments were then conducted on farm during one lettuce planting/harvest cycle, for 4 weeks. MNV stability was tested at room temperature in the laboratory or under ambient conditions on the farm. A one log reduction in virus titre was achieved after 30 days in water, 4 days on lettuce, 15 days on stainless steel disks, 12 days on loamy and sandy soil. For farm testing, infectious virus was recovered from both soil and lettuce on the day of inoculation. Although infectious virus was not recovered at later time points, the viral genomes were detected for up to four weeks. The observed long-term persistence of NoV, under both laboratory and field conditions, provides valuable information for developing risk assessments and control procedures to limit the possibility for NoV transmission in the food supply.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.141
Teacher spread0.124 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)→Same topicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies→French-language works237,207→