GAA-FGF14 ataxia (SCA27B): phenotypic profile, natural history progression and 4-aminopyridine treatment response
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ataxia due to an autosomal dominant intronic GAA repeat expansion in FGF14 (GAA-FGF14 ataxia, Spinocerebellar ataxia 27B [SCA27B]) has recently been identified as one of the most common genetic late-onset ataxias. We here aimed to characterise its phenotypic profile, natural history progression, and 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) treatment response. We conducted a multi-modal cohort study of 50 GAA-FGF14 patients, comprising in-depth phenotyping, cross-sectional and longitudinal progression data (up to 7 years), MRI findings, serum neurofilament light (sNfL) levels, neuropathology, and 4-AP treatment response data, including a series of n-of-1 treatment studies. GAA-FGF14 ataxia consistently presented as late-onset (60.0 years (53.5-68.5), median (IQR)) pancerebellar syndrome, partly combined with afferent sensory deficits (55%) and dysautonomia (28%). Dysautonomia increased with duration while cognitive impairment remained infrequent, even in advanced stages. Cross-sectional and longitudinal assessments consistently indicated mild progression of ataxia (0.29 SARA points/year), not exceeding a moderate disease severity even in advanced stages (max. SARA score: 18 points). Functional impairment increased relatively slowly (unilateral mobility aids after 8 years in 50% of patients). Corresponding to slow progression and low extra-cerebellar involvement, sNfL was not increased relative to controls. Concurrent second diseases (including progressive supranuclear palsy neuropathology) represented major individual aggravators of disease severity, constituting important caveats for planning future GAA-FGF14 trials. A treatment response to 4-AP with relevance for everyday living was reported by 86% of treated patients. A series of three prospective n-of-1 treatment experiences with on/off design showed marked reduction in daily symptomatic time and symptom severity on 4-AP. Our study characterises the phenotypic profile, natural history progression, and 4-AP treatment response of GAA-FGF14 ataxia. It paves the way towards large-scale natural history studies and 4-AP treatment trials in this newly discovered, possibly most frequent, and treatable late-onset ataxia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".