MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7075273367

PEM fuel cell heat recovery for preheating inlet air in standalone solar-hydrogen systems for telecommunication applications: An exergy analysis

2016· article· en· W7075273367 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTRNSYSInletHeat exchangerExergyContext (archaeology)Proton exchange membrane fuel cellExergy efficiencyHeat recovery ventilation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a theoretical model of a PEMFC with heat recovery system (PEMFC-HR) for preheating its inlet air to mitigate the performance degradation, when the fuel cell operates in an extreme cold environment, is proposed and evaluated by using exergy analysis. In this modeling study, HOMER and TRNSYS software tools are used to simulate the yearly load profile of a PEMFC in the context of a standalone hybrid solar-hydrogen system (hybridized with batteries) for telecommunication application in cold climate conditions. A dynamic theoretical model of the PEMFC-HR is then built in MATLAB environment to simulate and investigate the impacts of input parameters on the performance of such system. Furthermore, by using a high effectiveness heat exchanger (HE), the inlet air temperature of the PEMFC can be increased from sub-zero to well above the freezing point temperature. The impacts of the various ambient temperatures and fuel cell power on the exergetic efficiency of PEMFC-HR are then theoretically investigated and compared with the PEMFC coupled with an external electric heater (PEMFC-EH). Based on a case study for Eureka, Canada, the modeling results showed that approximately equivalent to 30% of the electrical energy, generated annually by the PEMFC, can be saved by replacing the PEMFC-EH arrangement with a PEMFC-HR system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.898

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicTheoretical and Computational PhysicsFrench-language works237,207