Poland - Public Expenditure Review : Background Papers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This report looks at public spending on \n pensions, education, health, social assistance, labor market \n programs, and public wages. Presenting the findings of a \n series of studies and notes compiled sice April 2009, it \n highlights how reforming such spending, which comprises \n about one quarter of gross domestic product (GDP), is \n essential for mitigating the impact of the economic crisis \n and for transforming Poland from a welfare state to a \n workfare society in line with Government's Vision 2030. \n The report has two main messages. First, Poland can take \n measures to reduce public expenditures on social sectors and \n public wages by around 2.3 percentage points over the next \n three years. Second, beyond supporting the fiscal adjustment \n required in the context of the economic crisis, public \n expenditure reforms can also help bring about structural \n changes envisioned as part of the Government's strategy \n for 2030. This report provides a comprehensive assessment of \n Poland's social sector and public wage polices and lays \n out options for reform. The summary report has five parts. \n The first part lays out the macroeconomic context. It \n emphasizes that Poland has weathered the global economic \n crisis remarkably well but that the recovery is likely to be \n feeble and subject to uncertainty. The next part discusses \n the fiscal fallout of the crisis and argues that public \n expenditure reform should be a crucial pillar for fiscal \n consolidation. Sections three to five contain the main \n findings of the report. Section three presents a list of \n important reforms of public expenditures on social sectors \n and wages in support of Vision 2030. Section four simulates \n the fiscal impact of public expenditure reforms, with a \n particular focus on state budget expenditures. The final \n section discusses how institutional reforms in the areas of \n medium-term and performance-based budget can support the \n reform agenda. Volume two presents the detailed analyses of \n social sectors and institutional reforms of public finance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".