Keratinocyte-releasable factors modulate extracellular matrix components in dermal fibroblasts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A fine balance between the synthesis and degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM) is required in maintaining the structural integrity of healing tissue. An imbalance in ECM expression leads to fibrotic conditions such as hypertrophic scars (HS). It has been demonstrated that keratinocyte-releasable factors can function as ECM modulating factors (MMP-1 and type I collagen) in fibroblasts. We have shown that Stratifin (SFN) is an MMP-1 stimulatory factor in fibroblasts that failed to suppress the expression of type I collagen in fibroblasts. SFN is an intracellular protein that lacks a signal peptide. As such, it is critical to explore its mechanism of release and identify the keratinocyte-derived collageninhibiting factor(s) for dermal fibroblasts. In this doctoral research project I hypothesize that keratinocyte-releasable factor(s) function as a stop signal(s) for wound healing by modulating the expression of key ECM components such as MMP-1 and type I collagen in fibroblasts. Two specific objectives were accomplished to address these issues. Under objective 1, the mechanism by which SFN is released has been explored. The findings demonstrate that SFN is released via exosomes in a Ca²⁺ dependant fashion. Moreover, only differentiated keratinocytes release SFN. Exosome-associated SFN exhibits a potent MMP-1 stimulatory effect. Under objective 2, using a series of systematic protein purification methods followed by mass spectroscopy, two proteins (SPARC and SFN) that inhibited collagen production by dermal fibroblasts were identified in keratinocyte-conditioned media. Using co-immunoprecipitation and 3D modeling, we determined that SFN and SPARC form a complex thereby regulating type I collagen expression in fibroblasts. The levels of these proteins in fibrotic tissues (animal and human) were also evaluated and a differential expression of these proteins between normal and fibrotic tissue confirmed their potential role in development of fibrotic condition. In conclusion, the identification of the mechanism of release of SFN and the identification of SPARC/SFN complex contribute to the understanding of how these factors are involved in the wound healing process. Also, SPARC/SFN complex provides us with another anti-fibrogenic factor that may be used to generate an effective therapeutic agent to treat HS frequently developed following burn injury, deep trauma and/or surgical incisions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".