Enhanced surveillance of non-O157 verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli in human stool samples from Manitoba
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Relatively few enhanced surveillance studies have been undertaken to investigate the extent to which verotoxin-producing non-O157 serotypes of Escherichia coli occur in stool samples received for the detection of verotoxin-producing organisms. OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence, molecular and epidemiological characteristics, and geographical patterns associated with non-O157 verotoxin-producing E coli (VTEC) in Manitoba. RESULTS: Thirty-two VTEC isolates consisting of 10 serogroups and 13 different serotypes were isolated over a 22-month period. Twenty-three isolates (71.8%) possessed verotoxin-encoding gene stx1 only, five isolates (15.6%) possessed stx2 only, two isolates (6.3%) possessed both stx1 and stx2, and two isolates (6.3%) possessed stx2c. Only three instances of indistinguishable pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns were identified. The age of the individuals from whom non-O157 VTEC were isolated ranged from eight months to 87 years. Mean and median ages were 30 and 22 years of age, respectively. Some areas of the province appeared to experience a higher than expected number of non-O157 E coli in comparison with the number of stools that were received from these areas. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated a large number of infections associated with non-O157 VTEC in Manitoba. Most non-O157 cases appear to result from sporadic infections, and these occur typically in rural areas. Continued enhanced surveillance is necessary to understand the temporal patterns of non-O157 VTEC and the underlying epidemiological factors driving these patterns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".