MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7076529489 · doi:10.25395/mwu.2019.29927231

Coaching for Immigrant Caregivers of Children with Autism

2025· other· en· W7076529489 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMidwestern University · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoachingAutismPsychological interventionIntervention (counseling)EmpowermentScale (ratio)Qualitative propertyDescriptive statistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Immigrant parents of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often experience stigma, decreased quality of life, and poor parental efficacy. Parent coaching is an intervention that has been shown to increase self-efficacy and decrease parent stress. The primary aims of this study were to explore the outcomes and experiences of a coaching intervention on immigrant caregivers of children with ASD.Methods: Researchers used a mixed methods case study design with one participant, an immigrant mother of a child with autism. The researchers engaged the participant in five virtual sessions. First, they administered the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) to measure perceived satisfaction and performance with select tasks and to identify goals for coaching. They also administered the Parent Effort Scale (PES), Family Quality of Life SurvEy (FQoL), and Parent Empowerment and Efficacy Measure (PEEM). The next three sessions consisted of coaching interventions to guide the participant with identifying strategies and resources to better support their child and work toward identified goals. The last session consisted of conducting a semi-structured interview and readministering the assessment tools. Researchers used descriptive statistics to analyze quantitative data gathered from the assessment tools. They used content analysis to analyze qualitative data from the post-intervention interview. Results: The participant identified a goal of supporting her child with dressing, showering, and toileting. Scores on the COPM, FQoL, and PEEM increased, indicating increased satisfaction, performance, and parenting efficacy. Scores on the PES decreased, indicating a decreased amount of parent effort needed to support the child’s participation in self-care tasks. Qualitative data revealed that the participant had an overall positive experience with the coaching intervention despite some challenges.Conclusion: Results from this study indicate that coaching may be an effective intervention to use with immigrant caregivers of children with ASD. Occupational therapy practitioners can use this intervention when working with families to target performance goals for children and improve overall parental efficacy and quality of life. The limitations of the study provide insights into how to improve future coaching intentions used.This project was approved by the Midwestern University Institutional Review Board, #23038

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMidwestern UniversitySame topicTheoretical and Computational PhysicsFrench-language works237,207