MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7077041540 · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106752

Use of a combined method of photo-electrocoagulation-oxidation for simultaneous removal of Ni, CN, Zn, and Cu from synthesized mine wastewater

2025· article· en· W7077041540 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersIran National Science Foundation
KeywordsWastewaterHydrogen peroxidePollutantOzoneOxidizing agentElectrocoagulationRadicalAnode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• More than 92% pollutants were removed by photoelectrocoagulation-oxidation method. • The simultaneous production of hydroxyl and superoxide radicals increases the efficiency of pollutant removal. • The stainless steel electrode had a higher efficiency than the aluminum electrode. A diverse range of heavy metals and toxic elements are present in the wastewater from mineral processing. A novel approach for eliminating contaminants from wastewater involves electrocoagulation (EC), which is occasionally employed in conjunction with additional techniques such as advanced oxidation to enhance the overall efficacy of pollutant removal. Therefore, in this study, for the simultaneous elimination of Ni, CN, Zn, and Cu, the combined method of EC-UV along with the oxidizing agents of hydrogen peroxide (HP) and ozone (O) were used. Based on the findings of this study, the utilization of integration of photo-electrocoagulation and oxidation methods together yielded the highest removal rates for Ni, CN, Zn, and Cu, with removal efficiencies reaching 100%, 98.8%, 95.2%, and 95.8%, respectively. The highest simultaneous elimination of the target pollutants was attained when stainless steel and iron were employed as anode electrodes, while aluminum and graphite served as cathodes. This optimal removal was achieved under conditions including the addition of 4 mg/L hydrogen peroxide, an ozone flow rate of 3 L/min, current density of 15 mA/cm², pH = 10, process duration of 10 min, and an electrode spacing of 5 cm in batch mode. The relatively high efficacy in removing pollutants was attributed to the simultaneous generation of hydroxyl radicals and superoxide, alongside the formation of coagulants produced through electrocoagulation. According to the promising results of this research, the integration of the advanced oxidation process with electrocoagulation demonstrates high efficacy in eliminating various contaminants, including both organic and inorganic pollutants, from wastewater.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResults in EngineeringSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207