MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The transition from CJ-deflagration to detonation in a square channel

2025· article· en· W7077042637 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueCombustion and Flame · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDetonationTransverse planeDeflagration to detonation transitionTransverse waveShock waveArgonDeflagration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experiments were performed in a 7.6 cm square channel to study the transition of a Chapman-Jouguet (CJ) deflagration to detonation in stoichiometric propane-oxygen, hydrogen-oxygen, and acetylene-oxygen with and without argon dilution. The subcritical transmission of a CJ detonation wave through a perforated plate produced a CJ deflagration. High-speed side-view schlieren, end view chemiluminescence visualization, and soot foils were used to identify the location and nature of the deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT) process. Detonation initiation was categorized as prompt or delayed depending on the effect of the compressible-turbulent flow immediately downstream of the perforated plate. For prompt initiation the transverse waves generated by the decoupled detonation were directly responsible for detonation initiation. The mixture detonation cell structure irregularity played no role in prompt initiation but played a significant role for delayed initiation. For undiluted propane-oxygen progressive strengthening of the transverse waves ultimately led to detonation initiation at the channel walls because of lateral transverse wave collisions. For the argon diluted mixtures that have regular detonation cell structures, detonation initiation typically occurred in the corners, most likely due to flame boundary layer interaction due to the absence of transverse wave collisions at the DDT location. The mechanism for transverse wave amplification was not present for the regular cell structure mixture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score0.170

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCombustion and FlameSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207