MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Simulations of unsteady airwakes behind moving ships using a mesh morphing technique

2025· article· en· W7077051495 on OpenAlexafffundabout

Bibliographic record

VenueOcean Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsCARE CanadaNational Research Council Canada
FundersMinistère de la Défense NationaleCanadian Armed ForcesDefence Research and Development Canada
KeywordsMorphingFinite element methodDoors

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shipboard helicopter operations are conducted in complex environmental conditions, where ship airwake, ship motions, and their combined effects can impact flight operations. To investigate the impacts of ship-motion-coupled airwake turbulence, the three-dimensional (3D) unsteady airwakes of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization conceptual Generic Destroyer (NATO-GD) and the real-world Royal Canadian Navy Halifax-class frigate undergoing representative ship motions are investigated using combined computational and experimental simulations. The computational simulations of the flow around the ships were performed using the Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (DDES) available in the open-source OpenFOAM software. To more accurately represent the unsteady boundary and the mesh deformation caused by the ship motion, a morphing mesh technique based on radial basis function (RBF) was ported to OpenFOAM. The RBF morphing mesh approach was validated against experimental data and its applicability for use to real-world ships was evaluated by cross-comparing its computed results with those obtained using the solid-body moving mesh solver embedded in OpenFOAM. The study analyzed the mean velocities, standard deviations, and power spectra. After validating against experimental data acquired by high-frequency pressure probes in an in-house wind tunnel, it was concluded that the RBF-based morphing mesh solver showed noticeable superiority over the solid-body moving mesh solver regarding accuracy in predicting flow means, unsteadiness and power spectrum when compared with the experimental results. This work is necessary to facilitate the investigation of the importance of ship-motion-induced airwake features for pilot workload and subsequent operational limits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOcean EngineeringSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207