MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A novel aerosol induction-removal system for mitigating airborne disease transmission in shared indoor environments

2025· article· en· W7077066210 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueBuilding and Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerosolHVACAirborne transmissionVentilation (architecture)AirflowIndoor air qualityAir quality indexTransmission (telecommunications)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• A novel aerosol removal device based on an induction-removal concept is introduced. • It removes up to 94 % of airborne pathogens while ensuring occupant comfort. • It maintains effectiveness when slightly misaligned, unlike conventional PV systems. • Risk (At 30 min) reduced to 9.5 % vs. 47.6 % (PV), 38 % (PV-PE), and 91 % (baseline). Ensuring high indoor air quality is crucial for mitigating airborne disease transmission, particularly in shared environments. This study introduces a novel aerosol removal device based on an induction-removal (jet-sink) airflow concept, designed to actively direct exhaled pathogens into a localized purification system while maintaining occupant comfort. Unlike conventional personalized ventilation (PV) systems, which rely on high-velocity air jets that may cause discomfort, the proposed device manipulates the airflow near the individual to efficiently capture and remove contaminated aerosols. Fully transient computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations based on an Eulerian-Lagrangian approach were conducted over a 30-minute real-time period in a consultation setting, incorporating human effects such as thermal plumes, breathing, and aerosol dispersion. The performance of the novel aerosol removal device was compared against a conventional PV system, a PV-PE, and a baseline HVAC scenario. The novel device removed up to 94 % of exhaled aerosols, reducing the probability of infection to 9.5 %, compared to 47.6 % with PV, 38 % with PV-PE, and over 91 % in the baseline case. Additionally, the induction-removal system maintained its effectiveness even with slight occupant misalignment, whereas PV system exhibited a dramatic increase in infection risk when occupants shifted positions. By creating a controlled airflow pattern, this novel approach enhances aerosol capture and purification, offering a more reliable, adaptive, and comfortable solution for reducing airborne infection risks in enclosed spaces over extended exposure durations. This study highlights the potential of airflow engineering in improving indoor air quality and protecting occupant health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBuilding and EnvironmentSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207