Proposal of a New Bread-Baking Method Inspired by the Amorphous Flour Obtained from a Proprietary Process and Yugone Bread
Bibliographic record
Abstract
【目的】本研究の目的は湯種法に代わる新しい方法で湯ごねパンの特徴を持つパンを製造することである. 湯ごねパンは通常のパンと比較して柔らかく甘味が強いことから日本を中心に人気を博している. 従来の湯種法では生地の一部を糊化させた湯種を添加する必要がある. 湯種の調整には24時間程度の時間を要するため, 湯ごねパンは生産効率が悪いという問題を抱えている. 本研究では湯種の代わりに独自製法から得たアルファ化小麦粉を使用する. 我々が独自に開発した加熱・せん断型臼式粉砕装置は, 穀物を瞬時にアルファ化させることが可能である. また, 粉砕条件を変えることで結晶化度を自由に調整することができる. 湯種の代替として利用可能なアルファ化小麦粉の結晶化度を明らかにすることで, 湯種法に代わる新たなパンの製造方法を提案する.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".