Bibliographic record
Abstract
GENUS CHRYSOPA Leach, 1815 Chrysopa Leach, 1815: 138. Type species: Hemerobius perla Linnaeus, 1758, sensu Schneider, 1851, In: Tjeder 1952: 202–205; subsequent designation, i.e., previous selections rejected and perla L. designated type and placed on Official List of Specific Names in Zoology as Name No. 22 (Hemming 1954); monotypy (Tjeder 1966). Chrysopa is represented by more than 50 described species, some with defined subspecies, in Asia, Europe, and North America (Brooks and Barnard 1990). In the New World, the genus is restricted to North America (Monserrat et al. 2001). Larvae are naked (Monserrat et al. 2001). Adults are predaceous, and the larvae overwinter as diapausing third instars within cocoons (Toschi 1965; Brooks and Barnard 1990; Penny et al. 2000). In North America, 10 species are recognised (Penny et al. 2000): seven of these occur in Canada; two occur in Alaska. Chrysopa quadripunctata and C. slossonae adults have been reported to interbreed in captivity (Albuquerque et al. 1997), and it is difficult to distinguish between them using preserved adults based solely upon the taxonomic characters outlined by Banks (1924; cf. Penny et al. 2000), which are highly subjective. It is possible, therefore, that C. slossonae specimens are included among those listed for C. quadripunctata from Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.080 | 0.032 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".