Meleoma dolicharthra (Navas) 1914
Bibliographic record
Abstract
M ELEOMA DOLICHARTHRA (Navás, 1914) Chrysopa dolicharthra Navás, 1914: 96. Type: male; GUATEMALA: Capetillo; original designation; BMNH (Kimmins 1940: 448–449). Meleoma dolicharthra (Navás, 1914): Kimmins 1940: 448–449. SYNONYMY PERTAINING TO CANADA Meleoma cavifrons: Toschi 1965: 402. Meleoma dolichartha [sic]: Tauber 1969: 35–37, 72. Meleoma dolicharthra: Garland 1979: 745; 1982 [1984]: 80–83, 296, Figs. 1, 3, 4, 11–13, Map 2; 1984: 94; 1985a: 737– 751; Penny et al. 1994: 55; Garland 2000: 40. Meleoma emuncta: Smith 1932: 583 [part]. CANADA: T = 18 (7♂, 11♀). FIRST RECORD: BC: 1♂, 1♀, Kaslo, 24.vi.[1903] 202 (R.P. Currie) [USNM]. FLIGHT PERIOD: April 30 (1931; Langley BC)–September 11 (1962; Victoria BC). BC: T = 18 (7♂, 11♀). FIRST RECORD: 1♂, 1♀, Kaslo, 24.vi.[1903] (R.P. Currie) [USNM]. NEW RECORDS: 2♂, Victoria, at light, 19.viii.1961 (FIS No. 61-2487-44) [collector unknown; PFRC]. FLIGHT PERIOD: April 30 (1931; Langley)– September 11 (1962; Victoria). LOCALITIES: Galiano I [sland], Spanish Hills [48°56'N 123°27'W; SEM]. Kaslo [49°55'N 116°55'W; USNM]. Langley [49°06'N 122°39'W; SEM]. Pavilion Lake [50°52'N 121°44'W; CNC]. Penticton, 2800–3000 ft [853–914 m, vicinity of Carmi Road E of Penticton] [Penticton, 49°30'N 119°35'W; LEM]. Radium Hot Springs [50°37'N 116°04'W; CNC 203]. Seton Lake, Lillooet [50°41'N 122°07'W; CNC]. Sugar Lake [50°24'N 118°31'W; CNC]. U[niversity of] B[ritish] C[olumbia] Forest n[ea]r Haney, 1100 ft [335 m], Garibaldi P[ar]k [Garibaldi Park, 50°00'N 122°45'W; CNC]. Victoria [48°26'N 123°22'W; CNC 204, PFRC]. 202.R.P. Currie spent 10 weeks in the summer of 1903 collecting insects in the company of H.G. Dyar and A.N. Caudell of the U.S. National Museum (Natural History) in the Kootenay District of British Columbia. Currie and Dyar both wrote accounts of this trip (Currie 1904; Dyar 1904). 203.Record from Radium Hot Springs, FIS 1950, A-2353A [CNC], has a cocoon pinned with the specimen. Meleoma dolicharthra occurs in Canada, in British Columbia, both coastal and interior. All Canadian localities reported in literature have been authenticated. The record from Seton Lake, discussed by Smith (1932: 583, as Meleoma emuncta), follows: “There is a female specimen in the Canadian National collection, collected by J. McDunnough at Seton Lake, B.C., May 28, 1926, which may be a new variety of emuncta. It has the general characters of emuncta, but the pronotum is margined by two broad, brown bands similar to gravida. There is an extra black mark from the base of the antennae along the lateral borders of the clypeus.” Smith recognised the novelty of this specimen, but not its true identity; credit for that belongs to Tauber (1969: 36, as Meleoma dolichartha [sic]: Seton Lake, Lillooet, ♀, V-28-26 (J. McDunnough, CNC)). All specimens reported here are documented with data in Garland (1982, 2000), or as new records (above). Based on label data, adults have been taken at light, and at a window (probably attracted to light). Also from label data, adults have been reared from larvae found on: PINUS MONTICOLA: Sugar Lake BC [FIS 1943, BC-4054C; CNC]. PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII: Radium Hot Springs BC [FIS 1950, A-2353A, as D[ouglas] Fir; CNC]. Biology and immature stages of this species have been studied in California (Toschi 1965, as Meleoma cavifrons); Tauber (1969) also included biological information in the context of adult variation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".