MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDY OF SELF-CONCEPT, IDENTITY, AND MEANING-MAKING IN ADULTS WITH ACQUIRED VISION LOSS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The qualitative research project examines the lived experience of acquired vision loss in adulthood and its impact on the way participants see themselves and the world around them, both sensorially and metaphorically. The research question, “What are the lived experiences of adults with acquired vision loss as they relate to identity and conceptions of self?” is informed by the researcher’s clinical practice as a psychotherapist in a low vision clinic. The dissertation includes a literature review focussed on the psychosocial aspects of vision loss to provide insight into the intended population and context for the study. Data for the phenomenological research study is from semi-structured interviews with ten adults with acquired visual impairments engaged in low vision rehabilitation at an interdisciplinary optometric clinic in Ontario, Canada. Data analysis using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), reveals five themes and 21 sub-themes. All participants report a deleterious effect of low vision on their daily lives, which impacts mobility, careers, emotional health, and sense of independence. Altered sense of identity accompanied changes to familial and vocational roles, secondary to changes in visual function. Positive and negative changes to self-concept were identified. While acquired sight loss is challenging, participants engage internal and external resources to build meaningful lives. Results from the study will inform practice for health care professionals working with adults who are partially sighted. Notably, a framework focused on meaning making was identified for psychotherapists and spiritual care providers working with adults with acquired vision loss.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".