MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7078759634 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.16994911

Sharing and depositing research data: A guide for researchers

2025· article· en· W7078759634 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsToronto Dementia Research Alliance
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)MetadataData sharingCitationCode (set theory)Research dataScholarly communication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ENGLISH VERSION Sharing and depositing research data: A guide for researchers This repository contains R/Quarto and HTML files for the presentation on sharing and depositing research data in generalist repositories such as the Federated Research Data Repository (FRDR). To acces the source code and complete presentation files please visit the GitHub repositorty: https://alliance-rdm-gdr.github.io/CUR_Res_DepositingData/ The user can view the rendered RevealJs presentations in English or French. Note that each slide contains audio that can be played using the controls at the bottom left of the presentation. For more presentations developed by the curation team of the Federated Research Data Repository , please visit our presentations repository All scholarly material in this repository is shared under the CC BY 4.0 license. If you use this presentation in your work, please cite it using the following metadata or the citation file in the repository: Manrique-Castano, D & FRDR Curation Team. (2025). Sharing and depositing research data: A guide for researchers. (Version 2025.09). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16994911. Contact: curators@frdr-dfdr.ca VERSION FRANÇAISE Partage et dépôt des données de recherche : un guide à l'usage des chercheurs Ce référentiel contient des fichiers R/Quarto et HTML pour la présentation sur le partage et le dépôt des données de recherche dans les dépôts généralistes tels que Le Dépôt fédéré de données de recherche (DFDR). Pour accéder au code source et aux fichiers de présentation complets, veuillez consulter le référentiel GitHub : https://alliance-rdm-gdr.github.io/CUR_Res_DepositingData/ L'utilisateur peut consulter les présentations en anglais ou en français. Notez que chaque diapositive contient un enregistrement audio qui peut être lu à l'aide des commandes situées en bas à gauche de la présentation. Pour d'autres présentations du DFDR, veuillez consulter notre dépôt de présentations. Tout le matériel académique contenu dans ce référentiel est partagé sous la licence CC BY 4.0. Si vous utilisez cette présentation pour votre travail, veuillez la citer en utilisant les métadonnées suivantes ou le fichier de citation disponible dans le référentiel : Manrique-Castano, D & FRDR Curation Team. (2025). Dépôt des données de recherche: Guide à l'usage des chercheurs. (Version 2025.09). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16994911. Contact: curators@frdr-dfdr.ca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.149
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.275
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.787

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1490.275
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0120.015
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0180.016
Open science0.0080.013
Research integrity0.0070.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1880.404

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReproducibility
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→