FORMATION OF CORPORATE SUBJECTIVITY: FROM EXTERNAL CONTROL TO INTERNAL SELF-REGULATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the context of digitalization and complexity of organizational structures, the importance of studying not only formal management mechanisms, but also hidden processes of formation of behavioral and cognitive loyalty of employees increases. The article is devoted to the analysis of the phenomenon of corporate subjectivity as a special form of internalization of organizational norms, language, logic and disciplinary strategies. And the latter rely on critical theories of power (M. Foucault), ideological interpellation (L. Althusser ), as well as on modern developments in the field of cognitive psychology and organizational behavior. The transition from external control to internal self-management is considered, in which employees not only obey regulations, but begin to think in the logic of the corporate system, including its evaluation categories (KPI), rhetorical constructions and value patterns. Particular attention is paid to key performance indicators (KPI) as a tool of mental discipline, as well as the role of organizational discourse in the transformation of the employee's linguistic and mental picture of the world. The psychosocial consequences of this process are analyzed, including the development of self-censorship , the blurring of boundaries between work and personal life, a decrease in authenticity, and an increase in emotional burnout. In conclusion, practical recommendations are offered for maintaining personal autonomy in the context of institutional pressure: the development of critical thinking, linguistic independence, psychological hygiene, and the formation of stable personal boundaries. The article is addressed to researchers in the field of HRM, organizational behavior, cognitive psychology and sociology of labor, as well as practicing managers interested in the ethical and conscious construction of corporate culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".