F I G U R E 1 Ascension Island with the three acoustic arrays deployed between 2017 and 2021 in Coexistence, resource partitioning, and fisheries management: A tale of two mesopredators in equatorial waters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
F I G U R E 1 Ascension Island with the three acoustic arrays deployed between 2017 and 2021 includes the northwest linear array (n VR2W acoustic receivers = 11; 2017–2019 deployment, teal-fill circle), English Bay Vemco Positioning System (n acoustic receivers = 9–22, 2019– 2021, pink-fill circles), Bates Point array (n acoustic receivers = 23, 2020–2021, yellow-fill circle). Fish were tagged in 2017 for the northwest array (n rock hind grouper = 20, indicated by teal stars), 2019 within the English Bay array (n rock hind grouper = 10; n moray eels = 10, pink stars), and 2021 within the Bates Point array (n rock hind grouper = 16; n moray eels = 5, yellow stars). The light, gray-filled polygon indicates rock substrate fringing the island (dark gray polygon). Bathymetric contour (dashed line) derived from Ascension Island Admiralty Chart 1691. Inset. Ascension Island (black star) in the South Atlantic Ocean (7.9467 S, 14.3559 W).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".