MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7079441045 · doi:10.26108/0nny-bz83

Photoreactions of mercury in the freshwater lakes of Kejimkujik National Park, Nova Scotia

2012· article· en· W7079441045 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAcadiaU-DEV · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMercury (programming language)Nova scotiaMERCUREOrganic matterReaction rate constantDissolved organic carbonEutrophication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mercury is a globally distributed, toxic environmental contaminant. Divalent mercury (Hg(II)) in freshwater lakes is reduced to volatile elemental mercury (Hg(0)) through reactions with Dissolved Organic Matter (DOM) and energy from solar radiation. Samples were collected from ten lakes in Kejimkujik National Park, Nova Scotia in May, 2008, 2009 and August 2010 and analysed for DOC (ranging 1.4 - 15.4 mg L-1), attenuation, anions, cations, and mercury photoreduction and oxidation rates. An integrated pseudo first order reaction equation was found to fit the gross reduction data extremely well (R2 value of >0.98; p value <0.0001). In all lakes, unfiltered samples (biotic activity included) had a significantly (p <0.01) higher maximum amount of Hg(0) formed (mean = 149 ± 103 pg) than filter sterilized samples lake water samples (mean = 94 ± 75 pg). Gross reduction rate constants for all samples were between 1.63 x 10-3 h-1 to 8.15 x 10-1 h1 (filtered) and 1.29 x 10-3 h-1 to 3.39 x 10-1 h-1 (unfiltered), and rate constants were significantly larger for filtered samples (p = 0.024). We hypothesize that the presence of particles and microbes primarily affects the amount of photo-reducible mercury available. Ultra violet attenuation was measured for each lake and was combined with the measured reduction and oxidation rates to develop a whole lake model for the production of Hg(0) with depth. It was calculated that the lakes studied cumulatively release 115.4 kg of DGM per year, assuming 12 hours of full sun each day

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcadiaU-DEVSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207