Preparing Canadian Baptist Ministries family units for missional engagement in collectivist cultures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this thesis was to determine how Canadian Baptist Ministries (CBM) can best prepare its field staff for cross-cultural holistic engagement in collectivist cultures as field staff family units. The focus is on CBM field staff serving in regions of the Middle East and North Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa, and Asia-Pacific, where there are a significant percentage of Muslims in the general population. The research used a qualitative case study where three CBM office staff and nine CBM field staff participated in answering open-ended questions to record the experiences of the field staff family during the pre-field, on-field, and post-field stages of their journey. The qualitative findings indicated that though there were a number of issues identified that needed attention by CBM to better support its field staff families, the field staff family has a unique role in engaging with Muslims in collectivist cultures. By leveraging the strengths of all the members of the field staff family unit, both adults and children, the family can make a significant impact in the field. The primary practical outcome of this research is the development and introduction of an orientation package entitled, The BETAB Project: A Learning Journey for a Family on a Mission, to support its field staff families.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".