MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7079582132 · doi:10.26108/hznc-g691

Nova Scotia's immigration strategies: Tapping into the potential of international students

2015· article· en· W7079582132 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAcadiaU-DEV · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaImmigrationNova (rocket)ProsperityPopulationGovernment (linguistics)Attraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The socio-demographics of Nova Scotia, Canada provide an unfavourable outlook for the economic future of the province. Nova Scotia is faced with low birth rates, a large aging population and a high rate of youth out-migration, factors that are predicted to give rise to labour shortages and to destabilize the economy. The negative economic predictions regarding the future of the province would significantly damage the prosperity and quality of life of Nova Scotians. International students who reside in Nova Scotia to pursue their studies have the potentialto offer the province an ideal opportunity to revitalize communities across the province. However, this thesis argues that there are persistent barriers that impede the recruitment, attraction and retention of immigrants in Nova Scotia. Unwelcoming and exclusive attitudes towards immigrants and a lack of supports and services provided to newcomers are argued to be among the main factors contributing to low attraction and retention of immigrants in Nova Scotia. Focusing on the retention of international graduates, this thesis employs a case study of the international student population at Acadia University, concluding that in order to increase immigration in Nova Scotia, partnerships must be forged between the Government of Nova Scotia, the Federal Government, post-secondary institutions in the province, local communities and the private sector, with the common goal of increasing immigrant attraction and retention in the province.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcadiaU-DEVSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207