MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7079638676 · doi:10.26108/yk8j-4v91

Perceptions of weight and health, weight history, and barriers and motivations for weight loss

2009· article· en· W7079638676 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAcadiaU-DEV · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeight lossSnackingOverweightObesityTelephone surveyWeight managementPerceptionCommunity healthWeight gain

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2004 Canadian Community Health Survey indicated that 23.1% of Canadians were obese which is a 35% increase since the Canadian Heart Health Surveys (1986-92). The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions, barriers, and motivators to weight loss to obtain an understanding of why weight loss attempts have been unsuccessful. Individuals ≥ 18 years of age with a BMI ≥25 kg/m2 were recruited from the community to participate in a semi-structured telephone interview examining perceptions of weight and health, weight history, and barriers and motivators associated with weight loss. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded to identify common themes. Twenty subjects (mean BMI=31.76±7.23 kg/m2) were interviewed. Based on their own height and weight, 35% misidentified their weight as healthy. Seventy-five percent identified an overweight or obese male figure as healthy, while 65% did this for a female figure. Participants reported that the fundamentals of health included weight (65%), activity (55%), and diet (45%). Subjects attributed their weight to a sedentary lifestyle (50%), snacking (40%), and family habits (25%). Perceived barriers to healthy eating included cost (50%), a lack of time (50%), and comfort eating (45%). Participants found that they did not have enough time for physical activity (35%) or that they experienced pain while being active (20%). Weight loss attempts were inhibited by a lack of motivation (50%), illness (30%), and stress (25%). Subjects felt motivated to eat healthy and be active when they saw results (50%) and started to feel better (35%). This study provides insight into the barriers, motivators and other factors affecting weight loss in an overweight Canadian community. These findings may be helpful in the creation of more successful weight loss strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it