Bibliographic record
Abstract
This creative writing thesis <em>Great Harbour</em> is a short story cycle that explores the relationship between people and place. The cycle consists of four short stories and follows a group of four young roommates living in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Each of the stories focuses in on one of the main characters and their experiences with a different piece of Halifax architecture. The stories are titled in accordance with the architectural style of the featured building: “Brutalist” features the Killam Memorial Library, “Palladian” features Saint Paul’s Anglican Church, “Folk” features the Maud Lewis House in the Art Gallery of Nova Scotia, and “Eclectic” features a fictional house that is inspired by the Victorian Eclectic style houses on Tower Road. In addition to focusing on structures, his thesis explores the important role that camaraderie plays in establishing home. The architecture allows the characters to find their place in the broader community, to strengthen their friendships with one another, and to discover that “home” can be found anywhere. The title <em>Great Harbour</em> is the English translation of <em>Kjipuktuk</em>, the Mi’kmaq word for Halifax. The word “harbour” is derived from the Old English word <em>herebeorg</em>, meaning “shelter or refuge” and, in addition to being a tribute to the Halifax harbour, reflects the community of stories, buildings, and people who are brought together in this cycle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".